Saturday, March 10, 2012
My thoughts on Caboodle Ranch
A while back, Caboodle Ranch was everywhere. News stories loved it because this guy did this for the cats..
I don't know the last time I ranted about "no-kill" shelters, and if you have heard it recently, you'll just have to skip this post. Don't get me wrong, I love "no-kill" shelters for what they can do, but the general population doesn't seem to realize they have their limits.
I also hate the term "no-kill" because of everything it implies. Just so you all know upfront, I volunteer for an open admission shelter. This means that they take in every unwanted animal from the towns it has contracts with. EVERY companion animal. The one that bites, the one that urinates on the bed, the one that is sick and dying, the one that is displaced because the owners are moving, the ones that have behavior issues, etc. Every single one.
With out open admission shelters, the world would be over run with companion animals. Currently every eight seconds a companion animal dies because it does not have a home. Every... Eight.. Seconds.. that is 10,000 a day. We could not turn every shelter into a no-kill shelter because frankly there is just not enough room or resources to take care of them all.
So "no-kill" shelters should be called "closed admission" shelters. For all but a handful no-kill shelters pick and choose the animals they will take in and care for. They usually take the cutest and most adoptable animals. They have to. If they don't, if they aren't picky, then their available resources are used up taking care of pets that only a rare few will ever adopt - and finding those owners to adopt those types of pets... well lets just say too many die waiting for homes.
Yes, there are the notable exceptions to this rule, and while I think that is wonderful, it also provides a false idea that other "no kill" shelters can and will do the same thing. I am constantly seeing people tell other people who want to rehome their pets for one reason or another to find a 'no kill' shelter. I can't help but be the bad guy and tell them that if they (who love that pet) do not want to care for it, who will want to step up and take care of it? (again, there are people, but again, one every eight seconds...)
So people go in search of soft hearted people who run 'no kill' shelters and give sob stories (real or made up) about their pet, and sadly many who run small local 'no kill' shelters can't say no. So they take in these unadoptable or sick pets and spend all of their money trying to 'save' them. And in time many of them turn into "hoarding" situations and usually end up falling into legal issues.
Don't get me wrong. I wish every single pet was saveable. I really really do. Every pet is worth saving, they are worth having a home and it is worth it to advocate finding homes for them. But until the human population gets control over the companion animal population we are going to have to come to terms with the blunt fact that there are not enough homes / resources to care for them all.
And when places like Caboodle Ranch take in more cats then they can possibly care for, then the cats become stressed and become susceptible to getting ring worm, and URI, and sadly death. Not because (and I'm assuming facts) he doesn't care or doesn't want to care for them, but because there are 600 cats on 5 acres and there is only so much that can be done. (and just for reference sake, one acre is about 10 yards shy of the playing surface of a football field)
Warehousing companion animals is not the answer. If we don't want companion animals to be seen as likened to a toaster in the eyes of the law, then we absolutely shouldn't be treating them that way.
Neuter your companion animals.. stop littering!! and things like this will take care of themselves..
(and if he really did have unaltered animals in his rescue and they were breeding, then I think I'm OK with them throwing the book at him)